Date: Wed, 14 Aug 1996 18:17:12 -0700 (PDT) From: Jaye Mathisen <mrcpu@cdsnet.net> To: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: New routed weirdness. Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.95.960814180648.708b-100000@mail.cdsnet.net>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Witness the following netstat -r output from a 8/14 sup system. med-pm4-017 med-pm4 UGH 0 7 ep1 med-pm4-018/31 med-pm4 UGc 0 953 ep1 med-pm5-000/31 med-pm5 UGc 0 25 ep1 med-pm5-002/29 med-pm5 UGc 0 22 ep1 med-pm5-008 0:c0:5:1:3c:1f UHLW 0 86 ep1 836 med-pm5-009 0:c0:5:1:3c:1f UHLW 0 23 ep1 838 med-pm5-010/31 med-pm5 UGc 0 0 ep1 med-pm5-013 med-pm5 UGH 0 428 ep1 med-pm5-014/31 med-pm5 UGc 0 0 ep1 med-pm5-015 chop UGH 0 0 vx0 med-pm5-016 chop UGH 0 0 vx0 The med-pm? boxes are Livingston PM's, the med-pm?-??? are PPP dialin users. The PM's run RIP V1. But if I read this correctly, somehow I'm picking up RIP packets where the host is advertised as having a netmask of 29 bits or 31 bits, rather than 32 bits. However, I don't see how this is possible. I guess I need some suggestions on how to track down specifically what's wrong. has anybody else running the new routed seen this? Heck, I'm not even sure if the netstat output even makes sense, since it seems to be showing a mix of proxy arp and routes, when the machines are all set up identically, and the users are all configured identically, it seems like it should be one or the other. Anyway, I guess I can tcpdump some data, and muck around with rtquery, but I'm curious if anybody's seen this behaviour with the PM's. It only seems to show up on routes to PM connected users, everything else seems to putt along just fine.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.NEB.3.95.960814180648.708b-100000>