Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2010 11:01:11 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/Mk bsd.commands.mk bsd.licenses.mk bsd.port.mk Message-ID: <20100822110111.GA58812@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <201008201215.o7KCF2kA004574@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <201008201215.o7KCF2kA004574@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 12:15:02PM +0000, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > pav 2010-08-20 12:15:02 UTC > > FreeBSD ports repository > > Modified files: > Mk bsd.commands.mk bsd.licenses.mk > bsd.port.mk > Log: > - Provide end-user DISABLE_LICENSES knob to disable licensing framework > > PR: ports/149070 > Submitted by: amdmi3 I'm curious what are essential differences between not defining any LICENSE and using DISABLE_LICENSES? I understand that it supposedly allows to disable license auditing framework completely, but showing the case when simply omitting LICENSE != DISABLE_LICENSES would be nice. ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100822110111.GA58812>