Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 18:51:44 -0600 (CST) From: Duo <duo@digitalarcadia.net> To: Ted Mittelstaedt <tedm@toybox.placo.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: MS Exchange server on FreeBSD? Message-ID: <Pine.OSX.4.61.0503201849290.17363@valkyrie.local> In-Reply-To: <LOBBIFDAGNMAMLGJJCKNOENHFAAA.tedm@toybox.placo.com> References: <LOBBIFDAGNMAMLGJJCKNOENHFAAA.tedm@toybox.placo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > > Actually I don't agree with that statement Duo. Every new version of > Exchange has gotten bigger, fatter, more complex, slower, and harder > and harder to troubleshoot when there is a problem. Sure there are > more features, but the price is the black box has gotten so large that > you cannot fix anything in it anymore. yes, that was exactly my point, I was agreeing. Embrace and Extend, as a policy has worked for Microsoft, by embracing a standard, extending it in a proprietary manner, hooking people in, and then trapping them in a system. >> >> I prefer to take the choice out of the users hands. MDaemon >> virus scans >> mail as it comes in. Users never get a chance to possibly infect >> their system. >> > > Today it is completely irresponsible to set up a corporate mailsystem > that lacks mandatory virus scanning. > Indeed, again, I agree. This is why my mailserver scans, as well as the desktop. I think you may have misunderstood my Point of view on this Ted. =) -- Duo Although the Buddhists will tell you that desire is the root of suffering, my personal experience leads me to point the finger at system administration. --Philip Greenspun
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.OSX.4.61.0503201849290.17363>