Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 13:05:20 -0500 From: Matthew Pherigo <hybrid120@gmail.com> To: "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.com> Cc: "edflecko ." <edflecko@gmail.com>, "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: FBSD jail versus VMWare? What services do YOU run in a jail? Message-ID: <35070175-6154-4234-934E-B94DA5175667@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201404222302.s3MN2brb059084@fire.js.berklix.net> References: <201404222302.s3MN2brb059084@fire.js.berklix.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Apr 22, 2014, at 6:02 PM, "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.com> wrote: >=20 > less flexibility (eg No linux jail in a FreeBSD prison) As a matter of fact, you CAN run a Linux environment in a jail by using the L= inux compatibility layer on the host. Of course, this means that there may b= e some kernel features missing, or bugs, but at least you have that option. Here's an article with one way of doing it: http://devil-detail.blogspot.com= /2013/08/debian-linux-freebsd-jail-zfs.html --Matt=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?35070175-6154-4234-934E-B94DA5175667>