Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2013 16:11:09 -0400 From: J David <j.david.lists@gmail.com> To: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> Cc: Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca>, freebsd-stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: NFS deadlock on 9.2-Beta1 Message-ID: <CABXB=RTP%2Bv7dXfZW99umbUJTQN2-L07PPfKPkASpf8feO9X43A@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20130824193814.GR4972@kib.kiev.ua> References: <CABXB=RSGrpUr34EdDu_6kab4nDm4NmYAoJZR8MPJOitpVzSNrA@mail.gmail.com> <158996730.12825374.1377265437471.JavaMail.root@uoguelph.ca> <CABXB=RTYZRs2okKu%2B3eZA1twNx%2B2J849Efo-8t=8ZSO3K9sRHw@mail.gmail.com> <20130824174103.GQ4972@kib.kiev.ua> <CABXB=RTLQ5NP1Y35SnF66uSM=eTscJJoy_w3XUGSrFoUvTFMaA@mail.gmail.com> <20130824193814.GR4972@kib.kiev.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> wrote: > No, at least not without reverting the r254754 first. The IGN_SBUSY patch > is not critical there. There is lots of other stuff in r250907 / reverted by r254754. Some of it looks important for sendfile() performance. If testing this extensively in the next few days could help get that work back into 9.2 we are happy to do it, but if it's too late then we can leave it for those on stable/9. Thanks!
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CABXB=RTP%2Bv7dXfZW99umbUJTQN2-L07PPfKPkASpf8feO9X43A>