Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 23:00:27 -0800 From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org> Cc: d@delphij.net, FreeBSD Current <current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: needs a tester with an SMP 7.0 box Message-ID: <47A2C38B.7050804@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0802010042390.26132@sea.ntplx.net> References: <47A21ED6.5070303@elischer.org> <47A25206.6070406@delphij.net> <47A25993.6050200@elischer.org> <47A25CED.4010504@delphij.net> <47A26D12.30205@elischer.org> <47A27AF3.2020701@delphij.net> <47A27C08.3010709@elischer.org> <47A28023.9000105@delphij.net> <47A290E7.4040900@elischer.org> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0802010042390.26132@sea.ntplx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Daniel Eischen wrote: > On Thu, 31 Jan 2008, Julian Elischer wrote: > >> Xin LI wrote: >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>> Hash: SHA1 >>> >>> Julian Elischer wrote: >>>>> I'm not sure why, but a fresh RELENG_7_0 with your patch, plus DDB >>>>> enabled does not trigger the problem :-/ >>>>> >>>> what happens without the patch? >>> >>> No, I mean that it used to crash with previous kernel which is built >>> only a couple of days ago, no more than a week. You want me to test the >>> case without patch? >>> >> >> We need to detirmine >> 1/ whether there is a problem in 7.0 in the first place. if not, we >> are done. >> >> 2/ whether the patch fixes it if there is a problem. > > I think it's safe to say that it _is_ a potential problem in both > -current, 7.0 and 6.x. I committed it to -current without trying > to duplicate the problem. yes but 7.0 is in countdown where -current isn't >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?47A2C38B.7050804>