Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 19:24:57 +0100 From: Antoine Martin <antoine@nagafix.co.uk> To: freebsd-database@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD database performance via JDBC Message-ID: <4638D779.2070700@nagafix.co.uk> References: 4635B9B4.3060905@nagafix.co.uk
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 >> I published this paper a few weeks ago that some of you might find >> interesting (see part2: FreeBSD vs Linux vs Solaris): >> http://devloop.org.uk/documentation/database-performance/ >> I have to admit I have been a Linux user for many years and I was >> expecting it to come out on top, and if anything I expected Solaris >> to do better - after all the tests are written in Java. All my >> predictions >> turned out wrong! >> Feel free to forward to [advocacy], re-use the graphs, etc. > Can you try it again with libthr threading library > http://threads.seas.gwu.edu/cgi-bin/man2web?program=libmap.conf§ion=5? > There's intent to make libthr the default for 7.0 and it may perform > worse in exactly this kind of benchmarks. You can run the benchmarks yourself, see: http://devloop.org.uk/documentation/database-performance/DIY/ It's as simple as running this from the top: ant -f test.xml junit.dbperf -Ddatabase=db-connection (but it won't generate the pretty graphics) I'll certainly put it on my todo list, but I can't guarantee when it will get done... - just looking at the todo list is on the list ;) Cheers Antoine PS: not subscribed to this list, so please CC me. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGONd5GK2zHPGK1rsRCuNnAJ9UT4YxcVtwUUkoEFC3FB8/VHyDeQCfclBq eDxd6K1nxBjakVVAOVi4kwI= =dQoJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4638D779.2070700>