Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 22:17:36 +1000 From: Norberto Meijome <freebsd@meijome.net> To: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: diablo-jdk vs jdk1.5 Message-ID: <20060528221736.56489f7e@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20060527204339.R1114@ganymede.hub.org> References: <20060524004530.37df6b39@localhost> <20060527204339.R1114@ganymede.hub.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 27 May 2006 20:44:51 -0300 (ADT) "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> wrote: > On Wed, 24 May 2006, Norberto Meijome wrote: > > > Hi all, > > 2 questions re. JDK 1.5 : > > - is .15 considered now stable? ( I remember reading that it was still > > considered alpha quality, but i cant see that notice anymore). > > > > - re. diablo-jdk : Other than the obvious advange of precompiled package > > (already done for me, SUN certified) , is there other advantage to using > > diablo-jdk instead of building my own? > > And, in the same vein, any caveats I should keep in mind when using > > diablo-jdk instead of jdk-1.5? > > My understanding is that the precompiled package performs better then the > one you build from ports, *but* ... I don't know why ... > > On my 6-STABLE machine, to get Azureus to work properly, I had to add the > following to /etc/libmap.conf: > > [/usr/local/diablo-jdk1.5.0/] > libpthread.so libc_r.so > libpthread.so.2 libc_r.so.6 > > else it just didn't work ... > > Beyond that, I've been using the precompiled one and been most happy with > it ... thanks - i've been using for a few days diablo-jdk with no problems this far. I reinstalled all my java programs after changing from jdk-1.4 to diablo-jdk-1.5... i dont remember having to change libmap for azureus... but I have added : ## diablo-jdk libz.so.2 libz.so.3 libpthread.so.1 libpthread.so libc.so.5 libc.so.6 libm.so.3 libm.so libstdc++.so.4 libstdc++.so I think it may have been for 'java'
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060528221736.56489f7e>