Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 22:09:22 +0200 From: Mikolaj Golub <to.my.trociny@gmail.com> To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bz@FreeBSD.org> Cc: FreeBSD virtualization mailing list <freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: HEADS UP: tenetative plan to merge VIMAGE parts Message-ID: <86tyg5ys99.fsf@kopusha.home.net> In-Reply-To: <20110213164530.Y13400@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> (Bjoern A. Zeeb's message of "Sun, 13 Feb 2011 17:01:28 %2B0000 (UTC)") References: <20110203193535.X80258@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <20110213164530.Y13400@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 17:01:28 +0000 (UTC) Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: BAZ> On Thu, 3 Feb 2011, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: BAZ> Hi, >> next week I plan to extract the initial parts from perforce and merge >> them to SVN. This will include: >> >> 1) vnet socket pushdown. BAZ> As some might have noticed I committed a bit of the "noise" from that BAZ> already. It's proven kind of hard to extract the things from perforce BAZ> with an additional several months of development and changes on top, BAZ> but it'll be easier with every commit to SVN;) BAZ> I will continue to directly commit small changes to SVN while I will BAZ> post larger ones here for review/testing. If you are tracking VIMAGE BAZ> in HEAD and anything breaks for you please yell at me! BAZ> Here's the vnet socket push back patch: BAZ> http://people.freebsd.org/~bz/20110213-01-vnet-socket-pushdown.diff BAZ> I have done some but not thorough testing on the patch. Given it BAZ> should be a complete extract from p4 I have been using it for more BAZ> than half a year though;) BAZ> I plan to commit this early-mid-weekish, so if you want to test let me BAZ> know by then. I did not do much testing but the patch works for me. BAZ> If you are on stable/8 you might want to apply the combined upcoming BAZ> merge patch before the above: BAZ> http://people.freebsd.org/~bz/20110213-02-vnet-mfc01.diff Running my notebook (stable/8) with these patches. BAZ> I'd suggest we'll check an updated smbfs patch after that and get it BAZ> in (if still needed). Previously I patched smb_trantcp.c in order to prevent crashes when mounting smbfs. Now it looks likes I don't need it any more -- smb works without that patch. -- Mikolaj Golub
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86tyg5ys99.fsf>