Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 10:39:41 -0400 From: Antoine Kallab <antoine@kallab.com> To: Mike Sanders <tmp1@freebsd.hypermart.net> Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Spam to list participants (from openhosting.com & softcom.com) Message-ID: <08BA00AD-BBFF-42CA-8BDE-730814E64A8B@kallab.com> In-Reply-To: <20140429140123.GA910@taco-shack.cow> References: <73354.1398734218@server1.tristatelogic.com> <535F1667.1050406@soliddataservices.com> <20140429114019.0eb3ce48@X220.alogt.com> <20140429124618.06d708ba@gumby.homeunix.com> <20140429204204.2e561935@X220.alogt.com> <20140429140123.GA910@taco-shack.cow>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Sent from my iPod > On Apr 29, 2014, at 10:01 AM, Mike Sanders <tmp1@freebsd.hypermart.net> wr= ote: >=20 > Erich Dollansky wrote: >=20 >> It is not really important. We just have to live with it. >=20 > Actually, we *don't* have to live with it... >=20 > If a policy were implemented whereby (say) the first > two messages of new subscribers where approved/denied > by the list-owner, this problem would end. This sounds like a good idea. Also, an 'abuse report' button on the mailing l= ist page might be useful.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?08BA00AD-BBFF-42CA-8BDE-730814E64A8B>