Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 9 Jan 1998 01:07:37 -0600
From:      Tim Tsai <tim@futuresouth.com>
To:        Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com>
Cc:        David Kelly <dkelly@hiwaay.net>, FreeBSD Hackers <Hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: GPS for xntpd Stratum 1 servers
Message-ID:  <19980109010737.63918@futuresouth.com>
In-Reply-To: <19980109172927.06125@lemis.com>; from Greg Lehey on Fri, Jan 09, 1998 at 05:29:27PM %2B1030
References:  <michaelh@cet.co.jp> <199801090340.VAA13302@nospam.hiwaay.net> <19980108232535.39313@futuresouth.com> <19980109172927.06125@lemis.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jan 09, 1998 at 05:29:27PM +1030, Greg Lehey wrote:
> >   You only need three satellites to get a 2D position.  I believe 1
> > satellite in view is all that is necessary to get the time.  That is very
> > practical nowadays [in Mississippi we easily get 8-10 satellites in clear
> > view] even if you only have a clear view of the sky on one side of the
> > building. 
> 
> Recall that there are only 24 active satellites, 12 above the horizon
> and 12 below the horizon.  If you block out half the sky, the most you
> can hope for is 6.  But that's enough, and I've had plenty of success
> with a GPS receiver mounted just inside a window.

  Right, I didn't mean 8-10 satellites from one side of the building,
merely that with a full view of the sky we can easily get 8-10 here.

> >   It'd be easier to use a couple of RS232<->RS422/RS485 converters.  At
> > the typical GPS baud rate (4800/9600 baud) you should be able to run the
> > wire hundreds of meters if not more (RS422 spec escapes me at the moment).
> > The converters run for about $30-$100 a piece.
> 
> What sort of time accuracy are you hoping for here?  To transmit a
> short datagram (say, 16 bytes) at 9.6 kb/s will take you 16 ms.  

  Since I am no expert on NTP I will refrain from further comments on
that.  I kinda doubt the accuracy is dependent on the transmission latency
though (I'd think that a long but deterministic transmission time is
better than short but unpredictable transmission time), but what do I
know.  Also, dependable transmission time over RS232 would be better than
unpredictable ethernet transmission time in this application, no?

  Tim



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980109010737.63918>