Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 15:55:40 +0200 From: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de> To: Ivailo Tanusheff <i.tanusheff@procreditbank.bg> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, n ramrani <nramrani@gmail.com> Subject: Re: df -h returns negatives values Message-ID: <20090526155540.557854df.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <OF61F18099.832F878D-ONC22575C2.004AF0D3-C22575C2.004BBBE8@procreditbank.bg> References: <20090526151024.2548fd4e.freebsd@edvax.de> <OF61F18099.832F878D-ONC22575C2.004AF0D3-C22575C2.004BBBE8@procreditbank.bg>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 26 May 2009 16:47:15 +0300, Ivailo Tanusheff <i.tanusheff@procreditbank.bg> wrote: > If that was the case it would say something like 108%, not -83%. Yes, this makes it really strange. I didn't recognize it at first sight, because of the missing header: Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/aacd0s1d 2.9G -2.2G 4.9G -83% /var Another thing that I recognize right now is the device name - aacd0s1d - which refers to the "Adaptec AdvancedRAID Controller driver" (aac / d0 / s1 / d); maybe some disk data is reported wrong by the controller? Not much likely, too... > The other strange value is the used size -2.2G. > I see only 2 options: > - Buffer overflow of the command (not much likely) > - Problem with the data on the disk. This could be determined by running # du -sh /var and compare the "total" result to the size of the /var slice (/dev/aacd0s1d). In any case, a check in SUM with unmounted partition would be good, as you mentioned. > Maybe you should run fsck -fFyv /var -- Polytropon >From Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090526155540.557854df.freebsd>