Date: Sat, 1 Nov 1997 00:35:34 -0800 (PST) From: Tom <tom@sdf.com> To: David Greenman <dg@root.com> Cc: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>, hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fxp0 and full duplex Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.971101003042.11908B-100000@misery.sdf.com> In-Reply-To: <199711010721.XAA28842@implode.root.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 31 Oct 1997, David Greenman wrote: > >> Cisco's don't support NWAY, so you'll have to set the Cisco switch port to > >> full duplex as well as the fxp. > > > > The 4700 is router, not a switch. And yes, you will have to switch it > >full duplex. > > My understanding is that the ethernet interface on the 4700 is 'switched' > in hardware - are you saying that this is not true? Switched in hardware? I don't quite know what that means. The 4700 is just a basic modular router chasiss (3 slots). The 4500 uses the same interface modules as the 4700. I've got a 4500 with a 6 10BT module in it, and am considering adding the single fast ethernet module soon. The Cisco 4000 series in one of Cisco's most reliable router lines, but getting a little long in the tooth these days (ie. modules aren't hot plug). > -DG > > David Greenman > Core-team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project Tom
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95q.971101003042.11908B-100000>