Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2003 13:32:23 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> To: Michael Sierchio <kudzu@tenebras.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PATCH: Forcible delaying of UFS (soft)updates Message-ID: <20030412203223.GA18848@elvis.mu.org> In-Reply-To: <3E985D19.1070206@tenebras.com> References: <3E976EBD.C3E66EF8@tel.fer.hr> <3E985D19.1070206@tenebras.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Michael Sierchio <kudzu@tenebras.com> [030412 11:38] wrote: > Marko Zec wrote: > > >- fsync() no longer flushes the buffers to disk, but returns immediately > >instead; > > Any system that does this should be flushed down the toilet. Softupdates > already breaks transaction semantics of FFS by breaking > link()/unlink()/rename() > etc. How does it do that?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030412203223.GA18848>