Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 17:46:54 +1000 From: Andrew Reilly <andrew-freebsd@areilly.bpc-users.org> To: Tony Maher <anthony.maher@uts.edu.au> Cc: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>, Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>, FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: 5 to 6 Message-ID: <20061026074654.GC47902@duncan.reilly.home> In-Reply-To: <4540525D.1090308@uts.edu.au> References: <17719.43574.819134.370333@roam.psg.com> <20061020005501.R32598@fledge.watson.org> <20061023060431.GA3186@duncan.reilly.home> <453D9F1A.5040803@FreeBSD.org> <20061026060221.GA47902@duncan.reilly.home> <4540525D.1090308@uts.edu.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 04:14:53PM +1000, Tony Maher wrote: > dumpfs / | more > magic 19540119 (UFS2) time Thu Oct 26 14:29:14 2006 Thanks for the tip. Same on this system, so I must have given it a proper clean install when I moved to 5.3. The dumpfs output seems to say a lot of interesting things. Might dumpfs /usr be able to tell me why the 6.2-BETA kernel/fsck can't find it's super-blocks? Hmm, that's odd. Most of the 400 cylinder groups in /usr have a "time" value that is in about the last month (most much closer to "now" than that). The very last one doesn't seem to have been touched since Jul 2005, which is plausibly when I formatted it. Neither does it list any inodes used. Is this normal behaviour or a sign of something ill? Cheers, -- Andrew
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061026074654.GC47902>