Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 23 Aug 2004 09:28:46 -0400 (EDT)
From:      "Charles Ulrich" <charles@idealso.com>
To:        "Pete French" <petefrench@ticketswitch.com>
Cc:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: What is Stable
Message-ID:  <33774.24.11.146.21.1093267726.squirrel@freedombi.com>
In-Reply-To: <E1BzAeh-000AxP-2T@dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk>
References:  <20040823045620.GG15251@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> <E1BzAeh-000AxP-2T@dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Pete French said:
>> still considered stable.  After the 5.3 release it is expected
>> 5.X will become stable.  At that point I'm not sure what to call
>
> Is that the point at which this list becomes the correct place to ask
> questions about 5.X on as opposed to current ?

One way to know without keeping track of the details of release engineering is
to just bear in mind that the day on which the first 5.x-STABLE release is
announced on the freebsd.org webpage is also the day that this list becomes
appropriate for 5.x questions. I figure that's a pretty safe indicator.

-- 
Charles Ulrich
System Administrator
Ideal Solution - http://www.idealso.com



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?33774.24.11.146.21.1093267726.squirrel>