Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 17:32:46 -0700 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org> Cc: Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl>, Jilles Tjoelker <jilles@stack.nl>, arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] fadvise(2) system call Message-ID: <CAJ-Vmoknojs%2Bdn3vmuUOg6imZDu020oU9N1S2Dniju4m3-9%2Bjw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4EAF1F39.1090008@FreeBSD.org> References: <201110281426.00013.jhb@freebsd.org> <201110311024.07580.jhb@freebsd.org> <20111031190359.GP2258@hoeg.nl> <201110311717.53476.jhb@freebsd.org> <20111031221627.GR2258@hoeg.nl> <4EAF1F39.1090008@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 31 October 2011 15:20, Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org> wrote: > On 10/31/2011 15:16, Ed Schouten wrote: >> What if we implement everything using the POSIX naming scheme, but put >> this in <fcntl.h>: > > My concern about that is that we're teaching people who start learning > programming with our sources to do non-standard stuff. .. if that keeps them on FreeBSD, what's wrong with that? :) It'd be fun to see the foot on the other shoe for a change. :) Adrian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-Vmoknojs%2Bdn3vmuUOg6imZDu020oU9N1S2Dniju4m3-9%2Bjw>