Date: Thu, 29 Feb 1996 10:01:54 +0100 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.tfs.com> To: davidg@Root.COM Cc: "Jonathan M. Bresler" <jmb@freefall.freebsd.org>, jgreco@brasil.moneng.mei.com (Joe Greco), hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Latest 2.1R panic. Hmm. Message-ID: <2715.825584514@critter.tfs.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 28 Feb 1996 15:47:59 PST." <199602282347.PAA07077@Root.COM>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Is there a general consensus that wasting one extra page for the message > buffer by default is desired? I know I've overrun it myself on many systems, > and it's very annoying when it happens. > If so, I'll make the change to an 8K buffer a standard part of FreeBSD. one page is getting to be too little. Can we make it a config parameter defaulting to 2 pages ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | phk@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD Core-team. http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk Private mailbox. whois: [PHK] | phk@ref.tfs.com TRW Financial Systems, Inc. Future will arrive by its own means, progress not so.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2715.825584514>