Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 23:38:13 +0100 From: "Steven Hartland" <killing@barrysworld.com> To: "Marcel Moolenaar" <marcel@xcllnt.net> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Missing system call in linux emulation Message-ID: <032401c36122$6ac8e940$b3db87d4@vader> References: <001d01c360ec$5c58aed0$0300a8c0@Xoanon><021301c360f0$c571e860$b3db87d4@vader> <20030812165610.GA579@dhcp42.pn.xcllnt.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hmm I couldn't even find these until I got to 2.5.X kernel so most strange
they would be using these but I'll contact the dev at DICE to double
check.
Thanks for the info.
Steve / K
----- Original Message -----
From: "Marcel Moolenaar" <marcel@xcllnt.net>
To: "Steven Hartland" <killing@barrysworld.com>
Cc: <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 5:56 PM
Subject: Re: Missing system call in linux emulation
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 05:42:51PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
> >
> > Any one know how I can track down what function is missing and hence
> > look at fixing it?
>
> In the linux kernel source tree, look in arch/i386/kernel/entry.S.
> There you'll find all the syscall entry points. Currently they go
> all the way to 271. Also look at arch/alpha/kernel/entry.S...
>
> Then, in /sys/i386/linux look in syscalls.master. There you'll
> see we only have syscalls up to 221. See also /sys/alpha/linux...
>
> One could:
> o Add proper prototypes to syscalls.master of the 50 new syscalls
> we don't know about,
> o Declare all these syscalls as dummies (see linux_dummy.c) to begin
> with,
> o Really implement those syscalls that are used in practice.
>
> Syscall 252 is exit_group(2).
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?032401c36122$6ac8e940$b3db87d4>