Date: Mon, 4 Oct 1999 03:22:22 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com> To: "Eugene M. Kim" <ab@astralblue.com> Cc: Brian Somers <brian@Awfulhak.org>, Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com>, David Gilbert <dgilbert@velocet.ca>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PPPoE offer. Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9910040320540.47259-100000@home.elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9910040307020.30514-100000@raista.pl.cp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 4 Oct 1999, Eugene M. Kim wrote: > I personally used this approach for some kernel PPP over TCP tunnels, > and strongly recommend it because now there are many protocols that make > use of PPP (PPTP, PPPoE, PPP over TCP to name a few). If we modified > the kernel PPP to create a new protocol family, we basically would have > to do the same kind of `porting' every time a new protocol (based on > PPP) comes out. Look at the netgraph stuff at ftp://ftp.whistle.com/pub/archie/netgraph/index.html for how we handle this situation at whistle. julian To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9910040320540.47259-100000>