Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 19:52:59 +0100 From: Bjarne Wichmann Petersen <nospam.nospam@mekanix.dk> To: Randall Hopper <aa8vb@nc.rr.com>, Bjarne Wichmann Petersen <freebsd.nospam@mekanix.dk> Cc: freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: OpenGL Message-ID: <20020104185158.RCWJ16766.fepD.post.tele.dk@there> In-Reply-To: <20020104123901.A1156@nc.rr.com> References: <20020103212324.ILQT16766.fepD.post.tele.dk@there> <20020103152948.M2739-100000@resnet.uoregon.edu> <20020104123901.A1156@nc.rr.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday 04 January 2002 18:39, Randall Hopper wrote: > 3197 frames in 5.0 seconds = 639.400 FPS > 3197 frames in 5.0 seconds = 639.400 FPS > 3196 frames in 5.0 seconds = 639.200 FPS Ok.. I'm pulling someting like ~667 FPS > 2.5% - not a lot of difference, but this number may still be low for this > box (XFree86 was compiled with the default -g, XFree86 probes my card as a > G400 SDRAM--it's a G450 DDRAM, etc.). Hmm.... where does one turn of -g? Or have I already done that by setting CFLAGS=-O -pipe in /etc/make.conf? > > My hardware: > - Matrox Millenium G450 32MB DDR 1x AGP > - Asus A7M266 DDR MB > - Athlon Thunderbird 1.2GHz Then you don't want to hear my setup: - G400 16 MB RAM AGP - Epox 8KTA3/+ PC133 SDRAM - Duron 800 MHz - 4.4-STABLE, X build out from ports. Why is my poorer setup performing better than yours? Have you tried tuxracer or gltron? In tuxracer I can't push more than 9-11 FPS on average. And the pusling part, it the same whether I run it at 640x480 or 1600x1200. Bjarne To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-multimedia" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020104185158.RCWJ16766.fepD.post.tele.dk>