Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 12:38:16 -0700 From: "Anthony C. Chavez" <acc@anthonychavez.org> To: "Jeremy C. Reed" <reed@reedmedia.net> Cc: freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: DoD study Message-ID: <20021030193815.GC8079@anthonychavez.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.43.0210301108190.6212-100000@pilchuck.reedmedia.net> References: <20021030185817.GA8079@anthonychavez.org> <Pine.LNX.4.43.0210301108190.6212-100000@pilchuck.reedmedia.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--FsscpQKzF/jJk6ya Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 11:15:26AM -0800, "Jeremy C. Reed" <reed@reedmedia.= net> wrote: > Which ones? >=20 > I do see that it should have the "Original source can be incorporated into > closed source products" property checked. That one (row P) is what I was referring to in particular, although my interpretation of rows K, L and M is that the GPL relies on K, while the BSD license could imply L and M should the "new user" get the source. Like I said, though, that's ~my~ interpretation of the table. I could be wrong. > Yes. Good advocacy. But I wonder what they are used for. That's another reason why I asked if anyone knew of any more studies. :-) --=20 Anthony Chavez http://www.anthonychavez.org/ mailto:acc@anthonychavez.org jabber:acc@jabber.anthonychavez.org --FsscpQKzF/jJk6ya Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE9wDUnbZTbIaRBRXERAm7LAJ9A8QERqyFZIkiyQmCUCt9RFZ+DtACdFxMD JACGNvVIIpmMbXLnR6L39C4= =63Sj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --FsscpQKzF/jJk6ya-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021030193815.GC8079>