Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      22 Sep 2003 14:50:16 -0400
From:      Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-chat-local@be-well.no-ip.com>
To:        Stijn Hoop <stijn@win.tue.nl>
Cc:        freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: faulty memory (was Re: Gcc 3.2.2 vs gcc 3.2.3)
Message-ID:  <44brtc4pzr.fsf@be-well.ilk.org>
In-Reply-To: <20030922182130.GA663@pcwin002.win.tue.nl>
References:  <200309221425.h8MEPWY68417@alogis.com> <20030922171115.GB45499@freebie.xs4all.nl> <20030922182130.GA663@pcwin002.win.tue.nl>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Stijn Hoop <stijn@win.tue.nl> writes:

> I just had this problem, P4 on Gigabyte mainboard, DDR400 memory, 2 DIMMs
> of 512 MB each. With a single DIMM (both DIMMs tested) memtest didn't
> find anything and the machine was rock stable, but in any combo of the
> 2 DIMMs, dual channel or not, the machine would lock up / throw
> gcc ICE everytime.
> 
> When I ran memtest on the machine with both DIMMs in, it would consistently
> show errors in one 512 half though, and so I returned the one 'faulty' DIMM
> and all was well.
> 
> Talk about strange...

Not that strange.  The second socket was having problems.  
Maybe just couldn't handle the capacitance load it was 
getting (which could be different with other modules; 
other sized modules, anyway).



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44brtc4pzr.fsf>