Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 22:56:39 +0100 From: Peter Risdon <peter@circlesquared.com> To: Stacey Roberts <stacey@vickiandstacey.com> Cc: Lars.Koeller@Uni-Bielefeld.de Subject: Re: apcupsd vs FreeBSD-5.2.x Message-ID: <4106CF97.50305@circlesquared.com> In-Reply-To: <20040727213646.GG495@crom.vickiandstacey.com> References: <20040727181557.GE495@crom.vickiandstacey.com> <4106A91C.70500@circlesquared.com> <20040727195517.GF495@crom.vickiandstacey.com> <4106B445.4080902@circlesquared.com> <20040727213646.GG495@crom.vickiandstacey.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Stacey Roberts wrote: > Hi Peter, > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Peter Risdon <peter@circlesquared.com>" > [snip] >>So you'd want: >> >>link cuaa1 usv > > > Okay, I understand. And I take it that if the serial signalling cable is actually connected to (labeled) serial port 1, then the corresponding device tobe used here would be cuaa0? > > The numbering of serial ports in FreeBSD starts at 0, so what would be called com1 in DOS/Windows is cuaa0 in FreeBSD. If the numbering of the ports on your computer follows the same pattern, then serial port 1 would map to cuaa0. Peter.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4106CF97.50305>