Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 18:14:21 +0200 From: Petr Valenta <xvalen@atlas.cz> To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [SUGGEST] Reform eclipse and eclipse related ports Message-ID: <20051017181421.8b429614.xvalen@atlas.cz> In-Reply-To: <20051017151546.GA68987@arabica.esil.univ-mrs.fr> References: <200510150015.j9F0ExKr085847@sakura.ninth-nine.com> <5739E97B-7EDC-4971-9EA5-01A44688A981@softweyr.com> <43522953.6050700@ebs.gr> <200510161310.18807.vizion@vizion.occoxmail.com> <20051017170146.60b1b90b.xvalen@atlas.cz> <20051017151546.GA68987@arabica.esil.univ-mrs.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 17 Oct 2005 17:15:46 +0200 Herve Quiroz <herve.quiroz@esil.univ-mrs.fr> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 05:01:46PM +0200, Petr Valenta wrote: > > I agree, > > many people don't need eclipse and puting it into whole port > > collection is bad because there will be no way to disable fetching > > eclipse-* with cvsup...I think that /usr/ports/eclipse/ will be the > > best solution. > > Actually I believe you can set up a refuse file to disable fetching > Eclipse stuff with cvsup. Something like that should do the trick: > > $ find /usr/ports -type d -name 'eclipse*' -mindepth 2 -maxdepth 2 \ > | sed 's|^/usr/||' >> <location of your refuse file> > > Anyway, I don't think this is really an issue... > > Herve Of course, but I thinks that /usr/ports/eclipse is much more transparent but it's only my feeling. Petr > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-java@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-java-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051017181421.8b429614.xvalen>