Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 18 Jul 1996 21:25:33 -0700
From:      David Greenman <davidg@root.com>
To:        ian@gamespot.com
Cc:        questions@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: in_rtqtimo kernel errors 
Message-ID:  <199607190425.VAA13618@root.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 18 Jul 1996 21:10:49 -0000." <199607182106.VAA01838@gamespot.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>I got a series of kernel errors in the log like this
> /kernel: in_rtqtimo: adjusted rtq_reallyold to 2400 
> /kernel: in_rtqtimo: adjusted rtq_reallyold to 1600 
> /kernel: in_rtqtimo:adjusted rtq_reallyold to 1066
> /kernel: in_rtqtimo: adjusted rtq_reallyold to 710
>about ten minutes apart and then it stopped.  Is this something  to 
>be concerned about?  I had streamlined my kernel (took out all the 
>superfluous GENERIC items) and increased the "maxusers" setting.  
>Other than these messages in the log, everything seems a-OK (knock 
>wood!).

   They are just informing you that the kernel is adjusting the route
expiration on clone routes. The message should probably be removed, put
into a compile-time #ifdef, or at the very least made less ambiguous
about what they're trying to tell you.
   In any case, you can ignore them.

-DG

David Greenman
Core-team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199607190425.VAA13618>