Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 20:00:42 -0400 From: Bill Moran <wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: watchdog question. Message-ID: <20060801200042.8af51559.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: <200608020052.23836.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> References: <20060801193945.83338.qmail@web25219.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <200608020052.23836.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
RW <list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> wrote: > On Tuesday 01 August 2006 20:39, Efren Bravo wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I've a freeBSD box and I've been seeing this > > message for several months: sis0 watchdog > > timeout. > > > > The box has two ethernet cards, sis0 (100mb) and > > vr0 (10mb). > > > > The messages isn't frequent but yesterday it got > > my attention. What does this mean? > > from sis(4) > sis%d: watchdog timeout The device has stopped responding to the net- > work, or there is a problem with the network connection (e.g. a cable > fault). I've seen this frequently with sis cards. My opinion is that all sis cards are cheapo crap, and watchdog timer is a workaround to try to make them work in spite of being crap. I've seen sis cards in Windows machines and they perform lousy there as well. But I'm no expert ... I could be wrong. -- Bill Moran MAL: Hell, this job I would pull for free. ZOE: Can I have your share? MAL: No. ZOE: If you die, can I have your share? MAL: Yes.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060801200042.8af51559.wmoran>