Date: Mon, 12 Aug 1996 00:47:26 -0700 From: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com> To: "Michael L. VanLoon -- HeadCandy.com" <michaelv@HeadCandy.com> Cc: A JOSEPH KOSHY <koshy@india.hp.com>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD vs. NT Stability Message-ID: <199608120747.AAA00372@rah.star-gate.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 12 Aug 1996 00:17:55 PDT." <199608120718.AAA14917@MindBender.HeadCandy.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>From The Desk Of "Michael L. VanLoon -- HeadCandy.com" : We don't have kernel level support for threads that means that the processes context switching for threads is handle by the threads package. 2.2-current has support for *user* level threads and it shouldn't be that hard to convert the test program from using fork/exec to threads. On my last contract, I used -current's threads in a rather large large library. Not sure if the current threads package in -current is in sync with the latest from the author so you may find a bug or two which may have been fixed :( Amancio
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199608120747.AAA00372>