Date: Sun, 26 May 1996 07:07:24 +0900 (JST) From: Michael Hancock <michaelh@cet.co.jp> To: Andrew McRae <amcrae@cisco.com> Cc: dennis@etinc.com, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: The view from here (was Re: ISDN Compression Load on CPU) Message-ID: <Pine.SV4.3.93.960526065914.17187A-100000@parkplace.cet.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <199605251840.LAA08624@doberman.cisco.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 25 May 1996, Andrew McRae wrote: > number are talking about here? Generally the bottleneck is > CPU performance, not the bus bandwidth. Cisco's performance > numbers *are* measured values, *not* calculated theoretical numbers. What CPU's are Cisco using these days? Are they still 68000's? They were a good choice a while back, but there must be some "moving to the next generation" pains now. I heard there's porting work being done to Intel because of the Compaq deal. I guess Cisco wants to take a stab at the high volume market. -mh
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SV4.3.93.960526065914.17187A-100000>