Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 09:46:54 +0100 From: Bernard Dugas <bernard@dugas-family.org> To: Mel <fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Extracting changed files list from snapshot Message-ID: <494A0DFE.2000501@dugas-family.org> In-Reply-To: <200812180826.49948.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> References: <4947B8AB.7000304@dugas-family.org> <200812170947.12794.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> <4948D650.8040603@dugas-family.org> <200812180826.49948.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mel wrote: > I'm still wondering if you're not better off with ZFS, but this does seem like > a useful app in it's own right. ZFS is not handling replication on remote servers very well currently, and they don't seem to care about this from the reactions i had on some forums. And i would not use ZFS for production system on FreeBSD now. FFS snapshots are stable in production, and adding a reading function on snapshot structures will not change stability :-) > The TAILQ_HEAD statement means it's creating a tail queue(3) (double linked > fifo/stack) of inodes. The snapdata structure contains the start of the list, > the size and a lock. The sn_blklist pointer, I will have to look up. > > I think i'm gonna have fun with this for a bit ;) This is christmas gift. But for who :-? Thanks a lot ! -- Bernard DUGAS Mobile +33 615 333 770
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?494A0DFE.2000501>