Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 09:34:29 -0600 From: Mark Felder <feld@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Subject: Re: preferred jail management tool Message-ID: <1422286469.3182385.219013237.42043664@webmail.messagingengine.com> In-Reply-To: <20150125013753.X33605@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: <20150123210026.GA45086@mail.michaelwlucas.com> <54C30BEC.3090102@gmail.com> <20150125013753.X33605@sola.nimnet.asn.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jan 24, 2015, at 09:16, Ian Smith wrote: > Excuse top-post, but the gmail header on this message was (surprisingly) > insufficiently anonymised to disguise its origin: > That could very well be Joe Barbish. It could also be someone in the same city who uses FreeBSD and likes qjails. Either way, I'm not sure how calling him out for advertising his own work adds any meaningful value to this discussion. And even if he is pushing his product it's not like he's misleading you about the current functional differences between qjail and ezjail... I understand there is bad blood from the forking of ezjail and lack of attribution (which I didn't care to involve myself in), but let's move on. It will either stand on its own merits or it will go the way of the dinosaurs... No point in making our community look so hostile. Thanks for your detailed review, Ernie.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1422286469.3182385.219013237.42043664>