Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 23 May 1996 16:33:09 +1000 (EST)
From:      David Dawes <dawes@rf900.physics.usyd.edu.au>
To:        jehamby@lightside.com (Jake Hamby)
Cc:        hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: X11R6.1 available...  Should we use?
Message-ID:  <199605230633.QAA13284@rf900.physics.usyd.edu.au>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.AUX.3.91.960522173553.25564A-100000@covina.lightside.com> from "Jake Hamby" at May 22, 96 05:44:29 pm

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>takes to make a port.  Does anyone on the XFree86 team know what the 
>status of XFree86 under X11R6.1 is?  XFree86 3.1.2C does seem to be 
>integrated into X11R6.1 itself and there is also an odd directory named

XFree86 3.1.2C is a snapshot of our R6.1-based code taken just prior to
the R6.1 release.  3.1.2C is beta quality at best.  Our recent beta
releases (3.1.2D and 3.1.2E) are based on R6.1.  We plan to have our
next full release (3.2) ready later this year.

>xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree98 which seems to be a subset of xfree86, 
>with no accompanying documentation!

This is for the Japanese PC98 machines (which can run variants of FreeBSD,
NetBSD and SVR4).  I don't personally know much about these machines,
other than that they are Intel-based, but have quite a different bus
architecture to AT-style machines.

David



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199605230633.QAA13284>