Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2000 08:56:59 -0800 From: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group <Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca> To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: Roelof Osinga <roelof@eboa.com> Subject: Dangerously Dedicated Message-ID: <200011191657.eAJGvnZ63007@cwsys.cwsent.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 19 Nov 2000 08:38:22 PST." <20001119083822.A39683@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20001119083822.A39683@dragon.nuxi.com>, "David O'Brien" writes: > On Sun, Nov 19, 2000 at 01:55:29PM +0100, Roelof Osinga wrote: > > Yesterday I installed the 4.2 RC1 in dangerously dedicated > > mode on a SCSI disk I had lying around. > > Why did you choose a "dangerously dedicated" install? "dangerously > dedicated" might go away in the future (as it doesn't leave space enough > space for boot0). Unless the normal slice configuration won't work for > you, there really is no good reason to use "dangerously dedicated". If/when dangerously dedicated goes away, will there be special provision for Zip and Jazz disks? Or, will we need to put an fdisk style partition table on Zip and Jazz disks, then slice them with disklabel? Regards, Phone: (250)387-8437 Cy Schubert Fax: (250)387-5766 Team Leader, Sun/DEC Team Internet: Cy.Schubert@osg.gov.bc.ca Open Systems Group, ITSD, ISTA Province of BC To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200011191657.eAJGvnZ63007>