Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2001 19:42:32 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sbin/newfs newfs.8 newfs.c Message-ID: <20011014194232.A50125@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20011014160303.A22301@ns2.freenix.org>; from roberto@ns2.freenix.org on Sun, Oct 14, 2001 at 04:03:03PM %2B0200 References: <200110110851.f9B8ptf60343@freefall.freebsd.org> <20011011112527.A54224@coffee.q9media.com> <20011011154203.C44561@dragon.nuxi.com> <20011013143225.B4527@ns2.freenix.org> <20011013172706.A53976@dragon.nuxi.com> <20011014160303.A22301@ns2.freenix.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Oct 14, 2001 at 04:03:03PM +0200, Ollivier Robert wrote: > Speaking of changing that value, shouldn't we also change the default block > and fragment values ? > > It has been said in the lists many times that 16k/2k is more efficient > (and I'm using it myself by defautl now). There has been rummored problems if you use something other than 8k/1k. This is probably something that should run thru -arch or -hackers before doing it. "-c" was a no-brainer as noone has ever argued that a low "-c" was prefered (that I've seen). -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011014194232.A50125>