Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 16:03:41 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr> To: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: On the need for moderated questions lists Message-ID: <87octcuklu.fsf@kobe.laptop> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0905291350150.10810@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> (Wojciech Puchar's message of "Fri, 29 May 2009 13:55:56 %2B0200 (CEST)") References: <6C96EEF057EDE24197FECB0D1EA035044A8F6EB461@h1341255.aoemedia.de> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0905271756370.52750@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <065001c9def1$54ae3f40$fe0abdc0$@za.org> <20090527124014.6998139c@gom> <20090527203000.GA1328@fusion.opticnetworks.net> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0905272235240.54915@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <b79ecaef0905271420v354a9e5ct6c0b77ed310b1217@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0905280002440.55278@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <70C0964126D66F458E688618E1CD008A0793EDCC@WADPEXV0.waddell.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0905280044120.55698@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <4A1EF89C.9040505@isafeelin.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0905282258030.62803@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <87prdsr5ep.fsf_-_@kobe.laptop> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0905290924030.5233@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <87r5y8cprs.fsf@kobe.laptop> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0905290954350.5488@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <87bppci91h.fsf@kobe.laptop> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0905291251260.10254@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <87my8w6shm.fsf@kobe.laptop> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0905291350150.10810@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 29 May 2009 13:55:56 +0200 (CEST), Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> wrote: >>> FreeBSD. for sure i will ask here if i will need help with FreeBSD. >> >> This includes at least two hypothetical scenarios: >> >> a) That the current list is an off-topic 'mess'. > > it is and will be. > >> b) That a moderated list would not be a 'mess'. > > b is implicit if rules will be clearly defined. Not necessarily. There were 'rules' in Nazi Germany too, and there usually exist at least some 'rules' in oppressive regimes, but they do not necessarily, by virtue of their mere existence, lead to satisfying results. But this is a philosophical digression that may be more interesting for other discussion forums. >> Collect data and summarize it in a very concise and readable >> way that proves there *is* a problem. > > already told you i will Thank you! I'll be watching for interesting updates :)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?87octcuklu.fsf>