Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1999 17:03:54 +0000 (GMT) From: Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com> To: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu> Cc: tls@rek.tjls.com, Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>, freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG, netbsd-alpha@netbsd.org Subject: Re: ARC/AlphaBIOS (164UX boards) .. was: Re: horrible hack / SRM Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.01.9901231703220.59627-100000@herring.nlsystems.com> In-Reply-To: <13993.63269.64554.310942@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 23 Jan 1999, Andrew Gallatin wrote: > > Thor Lancelot Simon writes: > > > You're missing the point. SRM, too, requires "constantly playing catch-up > > with new boards". The cheap new boards don't have SRM *because Compaq > > wasn't willing to pay anyone to port it, or their vendors weren't > > willing to license it and then pay someone to port it. > > > > The do-it-yourself SRM kit costs a whopping $75. In fact, it's what > > MILO is (partially) based on. > > > > What's this $75 do-it-yourself SRM kit? Does it actually include SRM > sources?!? What, if any, licensing restrictions are there on > distributing binaries produced from it? It sounds like the EBSDK (which is $75) but I didn't think that included SRM sources. -- Doug Rabson Mail: dfr@nlsystems.com Nonlinear Systems Ltd. Phone: +44 181 442 9037 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.01.9901231703220.59627-100000>