Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 12:41:10 +0200 From: Anton Berezin <tobez@FreeBSD.org> To: Vsevolod Stakhov <vsevolod@highsecure.ru>, freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/82235: New port: mail/mutt-ng Message-ID: <20050615104110.GA56428@heechee.tobez.org> In-Reply-To: <20050615090623.GA27207@alaska.cert.siemens.com> References: <200506150810.j5F8AEPA013710@freefall.freebsd.org> <20050615090623.GA27207@alaska.cert.siemens.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 11:06:23AM +0200, Udo Schweigert wrote: > As the maintainer of the mutt ports I vote against it. I don't think it is a reasonable position. There will undoubtedly be a number of people willing to give it a try, and the rest is just politics better to be avoided in the ports tree. > 1. The -ng project was launched because there was a feeling by some people > that the mutt developers don't drive the project with enough power. That was > mainly because the main mutt-developer refuses to include patches into > the source tree he considers unstable. This behavior is IMHO reasonable > and OK as I mainly want a stable mail client. > > 2. I think all features of mutt-ng can be compiled into mutt-devel if you > switch on the right knobs. > > 3. When did you try to use the sidebar support (it has been fixed by the > patch-author recently)? I got feedback by another user who said the new > patch fixed his issues. Did you submit a PR on that? Cheers, \Anton. -- The moronity of the universe is a monotonically increasing function. -- Jarkko Hietaniemi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050615104110.GA56428>