Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 25 Aug 2014 18:13:28 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 187926] New port: devel/liballium - Tor pluggable transports utility library
Message-ID:  <bug-187926-13-vHzMMOsyPu@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-187926-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-187926-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187926

--- Comment #27 from John Marino <marino@FreeBSD.org> ---
(In reply to Adam Weinberger from comment #26)
> Thanks for your opinion, John, but it's Fabian's opinion, as the maintainer,
> that I'm after. The terms of the LICENSE make skipping the whole thing not
> an option.

I believe my point before that the fact this is not enforced in ports and thus
we are not held to it is valid.  By your logic we IMMEDIATELY need to fix all
the ports that violate this.  If you say we don't, then it is an option.

Secondly, I am not actually that comfortable letting Fabian make up his own
licensing scheme as a protest against licensing framework.  In other words, I
don't think it's his call.  At this point, I'm almost ready to get portmgr
involved and make a decree.  Big picture -- because a lot of good points have
been brought up here.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-187926-13-vHzMMOsyPu>