Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 18:31:26 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 187926] New port: devel/liballium - Tor pluggable transports utility library Message-ID: <bug-187926-13-slDBudbdCO@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-187926-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-187926-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187926 Adam Weinberger <adamw@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Approval Needed |In Discussion --- Comment #28 from Adam Weinberger <adamw@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to John Marino from comment #27) > (In reply to Adam Weinberger from comment #26) > > Thanks for your opinion, John, but it's Fabian's opinion, as the maintainer, > > that I'm after. The terms of the LICENSE make skipping the whole thing not > > an option. > > I believe my point before that the fact this is not enforced in ports and > thus we are not held to it is valid. By your logic we IMMEDIATELY need to > fix all the ports that violate this. If you say we don't, then it is an > option. John, your hyperbolic statements here suggest that you're getting worked up. I would ask that you take a step back and a deep breath and/or a nice sandwich before posting more replies. I'm going to take the sandwich route myself. > Secondly, I am not actually that comfortable letting Fabian make up his own > licensing scheme as a protest against licensing framework. In other words, > I don't think it's his call. At this point, I'm almost ready to get portmgr > involved and make a decree. Big picture -- because a lot of good points > have been brought up here. John, do whatever makes you happy. I stand behind the decision to install a copy of the license, as specified by the terms of the license. Using the combination of LICENSE, LICENSE_FILE, LICENSE_NAME, and LICENSE_PERMS is not mandatory, but honouring the terms of the license is. Fabian, I and the port are not inventing a licensing scheme. We are installing a copy of the license. I ask that you re-read this, because this whole thing is coming down to you objecting to installing a copy of the license. If you would like to involve portmgr then please, by all means seek their input. For now I am going to let the port continue to install its COPYING file, and I am leaving it with the port's maintainer to choose the location he prefers to see it installed in. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-187926-13-slDBudbdCO>