Date: Wed, 21 Jan 1998 10:20:37 +0900 (JST) From: hosokawa@ntc.keio.ac.jp (HOSOKAWA Tatsumi) To: trost@cloud.rain.com Cc: mobile@FreeBSD.ORG, hosokawa@ntc.keio.ac.jp Subject: Re: problems with SVEC NE2000 clone Message-ID: <199801210120.KAA17757@afs.ntc.mita.keio.ac.jp> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 20 Jan 1998 16:53:56 -0800". <m0xuoWR-0002WOC@jli.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In article <m0xuoWR-0002WOC@jli.com> trost@cloud.rain.com writes: >> HOSOKAWA Tatsumi writes: >> In article <m0xuo2I-0002WOC@jli.com> >> trost@cloud.rain.com writes: >> >> >> card "PMX " "PE-200" >> >> config 0x1b "ed0" 10 >> config 0x1 "ed0" >> >> No joy, even with the irq present. It was one that I had tried. It seems like >> 0x1 "should" be the right config entry. I don't understand.... sorry. config 0x1 "ed0" 10 is the correct entry. >> >> ether 0xff0 >> ether 0x7f0 >> >> Why did you recommend this? It doesn't seem to make any difference, but I was >> wondering why you suggested the change. This card seems to be an OEM of PREMAX PMX-200 card, and this card has MAC address at 0x7f0 of attribute memory. -- HOSOKAWA, Tatsumi Network Technology Center Keio University hosokawa@ntc.keio.ac.jp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199801210120.KAA17757>