Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 17:15:22 +0300 From: Vasil Dimov <vd@datamax.bg> To: Roman Bogorodskiy <novel@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/82235: New port: mail/mutt-ng Message-ID: <20050615141522.GA56921@sinanica.bg.datamax> In-Reply-To: <200506150750.j5F7oJvB008881@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <200506150750.j5F7oJvB008881@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 07:50:19AM +0000, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote: > > in mail/mutt-devel. Personally I think project doesn't deserve to > be called "ng" just because of integrating a bunch of third-party > patches. I agree with that, it shouldnt be named -ng. Probably -nt for "not tested" or "new technology" is more suitable. I have been using mutt-devel for years and it has NEVER crashed, nor I have noticed any lack of features. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQFCsDf6Fw6SP/bBpCARAv09AJ9Nut5BR5TdRA22465HrPMAnvePyQCfURj5 EOyScO6ZbaqI+radpa1ZeYE= =0/wL -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050615141522.GA56921>