Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 08:09:37 -0700 From: Bill Huey <billh@gnuppy.monkey.org> To: Marc Recht <marc@informatik.uni-bremen.de> Cc: freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG, Bill Huey <billh@gnuppy.monkey.org> Subject: Re: 1.3.1 patchset 7 not quite ready Message-ID: <20020711150937.GA2654@gnuppy.monkey.org> In-Reply-To: <1026399909.781.84.camel@leeloo.intern.geht.de> References: <20020710234814.GE2394@gnuppy.monkey.org> <15660.64672.311655.234760@emerger.yogotech.com> <1026385676.781.30.camel@leeloo.intern.geht.de> <20020711111817.GA8289@gnuppy.monkey.org> <1026389333.781.49.camel@leeloo.intern.geht.de> <20020711145417.GA2578@gnuppy.monkey.org> <1026399909.781.84.camel@leeloo.intern.geht.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 05:05:08PM +0200, Marc Recht wrote: > Some parts of my application are using the JNI (mostly XSLT via > libxslt). So, it's not a real option for me. At least in this particular > case. But, it would be a big step in the right direction. Would this > also sweep out the Linux JDK 1.4 issues ? The JVM classic option is gone in 1.4 and is entirely built upon HotSpot as I understand it. I'd assume this port effort would lay some foundation for 1.4. bill To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020711150937.GA2654>