Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 11 Dec 2004 15:28:25 +0100
From:      Jeremie Le Hen <jeremie@le-hen.org>
To:        Shunsuke SHINOMIYA <shino@fornext.org>
Cc:        Jeremie Le Hen <jeremie@le-hen.org>
Subject:   Re: if_em int_throttle_ceil patch
Message-ID:  <20041211142825.GB65171@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org>
In-Reply-To: <20041210113318.BBF3.SHINO@fornext.org>
References:  <20041210113318.BBF3.SHINO@fornext.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Dec 10, 2004 at 12:00:21PM +0900, Shunsuke SHINOMIYA wrote:
>   The previous patch to change if_em's int_throttle_ceil into
>  sysctl-able cause a kernel panic. If you set em's int_throttle_ceil=0
>  and then reconfigure the em, it cause a diveded by zero panic.
> 
>  This patch for original if_em.[ch] which is attached to this mail is
> corrected this problem.

Great work Shunsuke, thank you !
Any chance to get this patch reviewed and commited ?

Although Bjoern Zeeb proposed to use a global way to control interrupt
moderation among network drivers, there was no proposition to unify it.
It would be a pity if this patch gets lost in the archives without
being either commited or submited as a PR.

Regards,
-- 
Jeremie Le Hen
jeremie@le-hen.org



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041211142825.GB65171>