Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 23:23:09 +1000 (EST) From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG, kris@obsecurity.org Subject: Re: PAM, S/Key and authentication schemes. Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0105302316060.18042-100000@besplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <200105290244.f4T2iNP21562@vashon.polstra.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 28 May 2001, John Polstra wrote: > In article <20010528174728.A39588@xor.obsecurity.org>, > Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> wrote: > > > > We also compile all of the PAM modules included in the base system > > into a static libpam which allows statically-linked binaries to work, > > up to a point (they won't work if the system administrator tries to > > use a third-party PAM module) > > We used to do this and probably still do. But I haven't tried it > lately. I build the entire world static (except for the broken perl part), so I try this (without third-party PAM modules) most days. Support for this in -unpatched-current is only broken in a few places now (including in a central place so it may be broken everywhere). Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0105302316060.18042-100000>