Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 14 Apr 2004 18:50:42 -0700
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To:        Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu>
Cc:        Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Subject:   Re: Second "RFC" on pkg-data idea for ports
Message-ID:  <20040415015042.GA59112@xor.obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <p0602040cbca3962685aa@[128.113.24.47]>
References:  <p0602041abca1e49dde40@[128.113.24.47]> <407C4035.8020609@ciam.ru> <p0602041fbca1ff481e60@[128.113.24.47]> <1081896823.772.58.camel@klotz.local> <xzp1xmq90gk.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20040414131949.3A56E43D31@mx1.FreeBSD.org> <20040414232927.GA56961@xor.obsecurity.org> <p0602040abca38b71031f@[128.113.24.47]> <20040415011809.GA58644@xor.obsecurity.org> <p0602040cbca3962685aa@[128.113.24.47]>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Apr 14, 2004 at 09:41:36PM -0400, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
> At 6:18 PM -0700 4/14/04, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >On Wed, Apr 14, 2004, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
> > >
> > > My hope is that if I get far enough along into the pkg-data
> > > project, the result would be that many of the common operations
> > > would be faster.  However, right now I can only say "that is one
> > > of my goals", and I can't prove it would actually happen...
> >
> >There's only a few things that execute external commands in the
> >common code path of port makefiles.  I've been working hard to
> >remove or limit them, and as I mentioned above it's possible to
> >optimize the current framework a lot further without too much
> >hard work.
>=20
> Hmm.  Well, if the pkg-data ideas did not actually speed things
> up (as I hope they will), then that would eliminate one of the
> main reasons that I have been interested in investigating them.
> I do still suspect pkg-data would be faster, but maybe it won't
> be as much of a difference as I am hoping it will be.

I wouldn't want to bet the farm without seeing it in action, i.e. this
isn't a selling point unless you can show it to be true.

Kris

--pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFAfepxWry0BWjoQKURAqxOAKDf7KyVpsYNpi2b3+tGOJxLuVeBTACfYVwI
cZwCUvJdcxXWXR9qCtK2Brg=
=0lPp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040415015042.GA59112>