Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 12 Jul 2002 00:31:47 -0700
From:      Bill Huey <billh@gnuppy.monkey.org>
To:        Marc Recht <marc@informatik.uni-bremen.de>
Cc:        freebsd-java@freebsd.org, Bill Huey <billh@gnuppy.monkey.org>
Subject:   Re: HotSpot progress report
Message-ID:  <20020712073147.GA4301@gnuppy.monkey.org>
In-Reply-To: <1026457146.17536.1.camel@leeloo.intern.geht.de>
References:  <20020712033608.GA3639@gnuppy.monkey.org> <1026457146.17536.1.camel@leeloo.intern.geht.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 08:59:05AM +0200, Marc Recht wrote:
> The system gcc is badly broken. Maybe you should use gcc31 (or even
> gcc295) from ports.

HotSpot is can only be compiled by a compiler after the 3.0 series.
I'm using gcc 3.1.

> > With the no optimizations at -O0, I get within 50 percent of the
> > native Linux JDK in speed running Java2D. This is really encouraging.

> Wow!

Yes, I'm still trying to track down the optimization bug in gcc 3.1.
There's a lot of funny stack manipulation things that HotSpot does
when using the JVM itself as a library (yes, that's correct believe
it or not) so stack integrity is critical.

Heh, I hope to have the problem nailed by the end of this week and
my most recently changes commited to our CVS.

bill


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020712073147.GA4301>