Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 06 Mar 2006 22:57:50 +0100
From:      Andrea Venturoli <ml.diespammer@netfence.it>
To:        Vince Hoffman <jhary@unsane.co.uk>, freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: vr0: rx packet lost
Message-ID:  <440CB05E.6000805@netfence.it>
In-Reply-To: <20060306211542.U87940@unsane.co.uk>
References:  <440C961A.1060107@netfence.it> <20060306211542.U87940@unsane.co.uk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Vince Hoffman wrote:
> 
> This may sound silly but if performance is that bad have you checked if 
> you have a Duplex mismatch ? (one side set to full manually and the 
> other to auto commonly results in duplex mismatches in my experience. 
> (see http://www.cites.uiuc.edu/network/autosense.html or use google for 
> more info)

Hm, my switch isn't manageable, so it can't be set manually to 
full-duplex and must be using autosense.
As for the card:

 > ifconfig vr0
> vr0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
>         inet 10.1.2.125 netmask 0xff000000 broadcast 10.255.255.255
>         inet6 fe80::213:d4ff:fecc:a6a2%vr0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1
>         ether 00:13:d4:cc:a6:a2
>         media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX <full-duplex>)
>         status: active

This was configured through rc.conf with:

 > ifconfig_vr0="DHCP"


So I guess this is not the problem.

  bye & Thanks anyway
	av.




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?440CB05E.6000805>