Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2016 12:01:43 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 206120] math/clblas: Update to 2.10 Message-ID: <bug-206120-13-ST80L3H7fF@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-206120-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-206120-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D206120 --- Comment #7 from Raphael Kubo da Costa <rakuco@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #6) > @Raphael, why was the maintainer-feedback flag (and needs-patch) removed = if > the current patch needs to be updated given it's failing? Isn't the maintainer-feedback flag used to indicate if the maintainer is responding to a patch send by someone? Since the maintainer is the submitte= r I thought it was redundant. As for needs-patch, to me it seemed to be used when a patch needed to be se= nt, so since there's a patch here (even if not ready) I removed it. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-206120-13-ST80L3H7fF>