Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2014 18:00:02 GMT From: John Marino <freebsd.contact@marino.st> To: freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/184952: x11-servers/xorg-server: Slave port makefiles all have same error Message-ID: <201401011800.s01I02mJ072958@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR ports/184952; it has been noted by GNATS. From: John Marino <freebsd.contact@marino.st> To: Koop Mast <kwm@rainbow-runner.nl> Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, zeising@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/184952: x11-servers/xorg-server: Slave port makefiles all have same error Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2014 18:56:05 +0100 On 1/1/2014 10:19, Koop Mast wrote: > I have trouble seeing what is exactly broken with the WITH_NEW_XORG > detection. On the survace it seems to work. Can you explain where it > doesn't work? > > root@crashalot:/usr/ports/x11-servers/xephyr # ident Makefile > Makefile: > $FreeBSD: head/x11-servers/xephyr/Makefile 338299 2013-12-31 > 13:22:14Z kwm $ > root@crashalot:/usr/ports/x11-servers/xephyr # make -V PORTVERSION > 1.12.4 Koop, Were you addressing Niclas? He claimed your commit broke it. At first I said, "well detection must be broken in that case", but after thinking about it, I questioned Niclas if it was actually broken. Since xorg-server still pulls in bsd.port.options.mk, the detection should still work (as you note). So right now, I'm working under the assumption there is actually no breakage at all, and Niclas just said the ports were broken without verifying first. If that assumption is wrong, he should correct it. Regards, John
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201401011800.s01I02mJ072958>