Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2001 23:42:44 +0200 From: Brad Knowles <brad.knowles@skynet.be> To: Rahul Siddharthan <rsidd@physics.iisc.ernet.in>, David Scheidt <rufus@brain.mics.net> Cc: j mckitrick <jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org>, "Gary W. Swearingen" <swear@blarg.net>, freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: code density vs readability Message-ID: <p05100324b7dfe4cb7f37@[194.78.144.27]> In-Reply-To: <20011002222232.B28111@lpt.ens.fr> References: <20011002213051.A28111@lpt.ens.fr> <Pine.BSI.4.20.0110021606080.7990-100000@brain.mics.net> <20011002222232.B28111@lpt.ens.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 10:22 PM +0200 10/2/01, Rahul Siddharthan wrote:
>> I'm not convinced this needs to be part of the editor. Checkout par
>> (ports/textproc/par), I think it does everything vim does.
>
> Well, I want it to be part of the editor. I use the editor more for
> normal text than for programming.
You use "gqap". I use "{!}par". What's the difference?
>> > For programs, I like its syntax highlighting. I don't know whether
>> > nvi has that.
>>
>> I hope not...
>
> Well, you're obviously not an emacs user, anyway :)
I definitely like the idea of syntax highlighting.
--
Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles@skynet.be>
H4sICIFgXzsCA2RtYS1zaWcAPVHLbsMwDDvXX0H0kkvbfxiwVw8FCmzAzqqj1F4dy7CdBfn7
Kc6wmyGRFEnvvxiWQoCvqI7RSWTcfGXQNqCUAnfIU+AT8OZ/GCNjRVlH0bKpguJkxiITZqes
MxwpSucyDJzXxQEUe/ihgXqJXUXwD9ajB6NHonLmNrUSK9nacHQnH097szO74xFXqtlbT3il
wMsBz5cnfCR5cEmci0Rj9u/jqBbPeES1I4PeFBXPUIT1XDSOuutFXylzrQvGyboWstCoQZyP
dxX4dLx0eauFe1x9puhoi0Ao1omEJo+BZ6XLVNaVpWiKekxN0VK2VMpmAy+Bk7ZV4SO+p1L/
uErNRS/qH2iFU+iNOtbcmVt9N16lfF7tLv9FXNj8AiyNcOi1AQAA
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?p05100324b7dfe4cb7f37>